小罗伯特·肯尼迪推崇的争议性疫苗试验在几内亚比绍获批推进
Controversial vaccine trial touted by RFK Jr gets go-ahead in Guinea-Bissau
以下为原文逐段中文翻译,保留图表与说明。AI 翻译并经 AI 对照复核,仍可能存在错误;核对数据和引用时请同时查看原文。译文发布:2026年10月17日 06:30(北京时间)。
一项将不向部分非洲新生儿提供乙肝疫苗的争议性研究试验,本周获批推进。
这是美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)部长、长期反对疫苗的小罗伯特·肯尼迪(Robert F Kennedy Jr)疫苗构想的核心部分。
在上个月的一场反疫苗会议上,肯尼迪称赞了这项试验背后的丹麦研究人员,并将美国支持的新生儿乙肝研究吹捧为特朗普政府疫苗议程的典范,该议程包括大幅削减疫苗推荐,并对疫苗的安全性和有效性提出质疑。
费城儿童医院的传染病医生保罗·奥菲特(Paul Offit)说,肯尼迪“想让我们这个国家不再使用出生剂次的疫苗。这就是他的目标。”
奥菲特补充说,由于存在重大的伦理问题,肯尼迪永远无法在美国进行这项试验。“他是在利用一个发展中国家……难道是因为非洲的孩子比这里的孩子更可以被牺牲吗?”
丹麦研究人员计划在几内亚比绍招募14,000名婴儿参与该试验,在出生时给一半婴儿接种乙肝疫苗,而对另一半婴儿在出生后的头六周内不接种。
研究人员所属机构南丹麦大学的伦理委员会本周投票决定推进该试验,几内亚比绍的官员也为该项目开了绿灯;此前在今年早些时候引发国际哗然后,卫生部长基尼·南托特(Quinhin Nantote)最初曾表示该项目已暂停。
创始成员斯蒂格·伯尔森·汉森(Stig Børsen Hansen)是向丹麦该委员会提交这项研究的两位评审之一,他于周五辞职以示抗议,理由是该研究存在重大伦理问题。
汉森说:“你现在是把新生儿纳入一场抽签来检验一个假设。”被随机选中不接种出生剂次疫苗的儿童——那些“在抽签中落败”的孩子——在出生最初的日子里就面临感染乙肝的风险,而乙肝可能造成不可逆的终身损害。汉森说:“他们是在作为一个研究项目的一部分这一背景下感染乙肝的”,这实际上使他们的感染是“被设计”出来的。
该委员会另外三名成员也已辞职以示抗议。
据报道,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)已在本年度预算中为该项目拨出160万美元,并将由亿万富翁活动家比尔·阿克曼(Bill Ackman)联合创立的潘兴广场基金会(Pershing Square Foundation)和蓝铃基金会(Bluebell Foundation)提供等额私人资金予以匹配。
CDC、丹麦研究人员、潘兴广场和南托特均未回应《卫报》就这项试验提出的问题。
该试验获丹麦伦理委员会批准的消息最先由《滚石》(Rolling Stone)报道。这是更新后方案细节的首次披露。
据与《卫报》分享的细节,几内亚比绍的研究方案自1月发布以来已发生变化。研究人员现在将在产妇分娩前对其进行乙肝检测。检测呈阳性的母亲所生的婴儿将接种疫苗,且不纳入试验。但检测呈阴性的母亲所生的婴儿则可能被纳入。新方案尚未公开分享。
在此前的研究中,感染乙肝的儿童有一半是在出生后通过社区接触感染的。奥菲特说:“这种病毒可以随意传播。”它能在物体表面存活长达七天,并且可以通过共用毛巾、牙刷和指甲钳而感染。此外,乙肝检测有5%的假阴性率,这可能让人误以为分娩的父母没有携带病毒。
丹麦奥胡斯大学统计学与药物计量学教授亨里克·斯特夫林(Henrik Støvring)说,数十年的研究已清楚表明这种疫苗是有益的,这意味着把一些孩子分到接种组、另一些孩子分到未接种组是不公平的。
根据《赫尔辛基宣言》,国际医学研究必须获得东道国和申办国两国伦理委员会的批准。
南丹麦大学的丹麦研究伦理委员会此前从未审议过医学研究,但它修改了规则以便对这项研究进行表决。尽管具有专业知识的委员会成员反对批准,但多数人裁定推进。
斯特夫林说:“把这件事拿到那样的委员会里是非常不寻常的。”丹麦的国家伦理委员会负责监管医学研究,但这项研究不在其职权范围内,因为它不会在丹麦进行。
然而,谈到这项试验时,斯特夫林说:“我看不出为什么不能在丹麦做。”事实上,有几个条件使丹麦成为更合适的地点。在丹麦,除非母亲病毒检测呈阳性,否则通常不会给新生儿接种乙肝疫苗,而在丹麦所有孕妇都会接受这项检测。
几内亚比绍是全球乙肝感染率最高的国家之一,约18%的成年人携带该病毒。虽然它可能在分娩时由母亲传给孩子,但也可能由另一位家长、亲属、兄弟姐妹或照护者传播。在生命第一年感染乙肝的儿童,出现严重后果的可能性显著更高,包括慢性感染和肝癌。
由丹麦研究人员彼得·奥比(Peter Aaby)和克里斯蒂娜·斯塔贝尔·本(Christine Stabell Benn)运营的班迪姆健康项目(Bandim Health Project)已在几内亚比绍运作数十年,并与该国卫生系统紧密交织。至少有一名高级官员——现任公共卫生主任——就在去年12月还兼任班迪姆的职务。
肯尼迪在最近一场反疫苗会议上称赞这些丹麦研究人员,称他们是“疫苗研究界的神明”。肯尼迪声称,他们此前进行的一项研究表明,接种疫苗后“可能会出现大规模伤害和灾难性伤害,而它们就藏在众目睽睽之下”。他没有提到,同一批研究人员的另一项后续研究发现根本没有任何影响。
这项研究将聚焦于疫苗接种与死亡率,以及皮肤状况和神经发育状况等结果。斯特夫林说:“这项试验的主要问题在于,有一些非常众所周知的恶性疾病,你可以用这种疫苗来预防。而他们接下来想研究的东西则极具推测性——在世卫组织和其他方面都表示应该在出生时就接种这种疫苗的情况下,就这样,没得商量。”
在周四的一场简报会上被问及这项研究时,一直反对该试验的非洲疾控中心(Africa CDC)的一名官员表示,美国与几内亚比绍之间正在进行“持续讨论”,更多细节将很快公布。几内亚比绍原计划在2027年开始为所有新生儿接种乙肝疫苗,但已将这项行动推迟到2028年。
奥菲特说,肯尼迪和丹麦研究人员“利用了标准护理推行中的这一延迟,不必要地让这些孩子置身于风险之中。这是多么可怕的事。这是多么不道德、多么残忍的事。”
- 本文于2026年10月13日作出更正。此前的版本称 CIDRAP 最先报道了该研究试验获丹麦伦理委员会批准的消息。实际上最先报道该消息的是《滚石》(Rolling Stone)。
展开英文原文 · 与中文逐段对应
Controversial vaccine trial touted by RFK Jr gets go-ahead in Guinea-Bissau
A controversial research trial that will withhold hepatitis B vaccines from some African newborns was given approval to move forward this week.
It is a central part of the vaccine vision for Robert F Kennedy Jr , the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and a longtime vaccine opponent.
At an anti-vaccine conference last month, Kennedy praised the Danish researchers behind the trial and touted US-supported research on hepatitis B in newborns as exemplifying the Trump administration’s agenda for vaccines, which has included slashing vaccine recommendations and casting doubt on the safety and effectiveness of shots.
Kennedy “wants to make it so we don’t use a birth dose here in this country,” said Paul Offit, an infectious disease physician at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “That’s the goal.”
Kennedy would never be able to do the trial in the US because of its significant ethical concerns, Offit added. “He’s taking advantage of a developing country … Is it because children in Africa are more expendable than children here?”
Danish researchers plan to enroll 14,000 infants in Guinea-Bissau in the trial, giving the hepatitis B vaccine to half of the babies at birth and withholding it from the others for the first six weeks of life.
An ethics committee at the researchers’ home institution of the University of Southern Denmark voted this week to proceed with the trial, and officials in Guinea-Bissau have also greenlit the project, which the health minister, Quinhin Nantote, initially said was suspended after international uproar earlier this year.
Stig Børsen Hansen, a founding member who was one of two reviewers who presented the study to the Danish committee, resigned from the group in protest on Friday, citing major ethical issues with the study.
“You are now enrolling newborns in a lottery to test a hypothesis,” Hansen said. The children who are randomly selected not to receive the birth dose of the vaccine, those who “lost the lottery”, face in their earliest days the risk of contracting hepatitis B, which can cause irreversible lifelong damage. “They contract hepatitis B in the context of being part of a research project,” Hansen said, which made their infection happen, in effect, “by design”.
Three other members of the committee have also resigned in protest.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reportedly set aside $1.6m in this year’s budget for the project, and it will be matched with private funding from the Pershing Square Foundation, which was co-founded by the billionaire activist Bill Ackman, and the Bluebell Foundation.
The CDC, the Danish researchers, Pershing Square and Nantote have not responded to the Guardian’s questions about this trial.
The news that the trial was approved by the Denmark ethics committee was first reported by Rolling Stone. This is the first time details of the updated protocol have been disclosed.
The Guinea-Bissau study protocol has changed since it was posted in January, according to details shared with the Guardian. The researchers will now test mothers for hepatitis B before they give birth. The babies of mothers who test positive will be given the vaccine and will not be included in the trial. But the babies of mothers whose tests are negative may be enrolled. The new protocol has not been shared publicly.
In previous research, half of children who contracted hepatitis B did so after birth, through community exposures. “This virus can be transmitted casually,” Offit said. It can live on surfaces for up to seven days, and it can be acquired by sharing washcloths, toothbrushes and fingernail clippers. In addition, the hepatitis B test has a 5% false negative rate, which could provide false assurance that a birthing parent does not have the virus.
Decades of research make it clear that the vaccine would be beneficial, which means it would be unfair to place some children in the vaccinated group and some children in the unvaccinated group, said Henrik Støvring, a professor of statistics and pharmacometrics at Aarhus University in Denmark.
According to the Helsinki declaration, international medical research must be approved by ethics committees in both the host and sponsor countries.
The Danish research ethics committee at the University of Southern Denmark had never considered medical studies before, but it changed the rules in order to vote on this one. While committee members with expertise argued against approving it, the majority ruled to move forward.
“It’s very unusual to bring this into a committee like that,” Støvring said. The national ethics committee in Denmark oversees medical research, but this study was outside of their purview because it won’t take place in Denmark.
Yet “I don’t see why you couldn’t do it in Denmark,” Støvring said of the trial. In fact, several conditions make it a better location. The hepatitis B vaccine is not usually given to newborns in Denmark unless the mother is positive for the virus, for which all pregnant people are tested in Denmark.
Guinea-Bissau has some of the highest rates of hepatitis B in the world, with about 18% of adults carrying the virus. While it may be transmitted from mother to child during birth, it could also be transmitted from another parent, relatives, siblings or caregivers. Children who are infected with hepatitis B in the first year of life are significantly more likely to develop severe outcomes, including chronic infection and liver cancer.
The Bandim Health Project, run by Danish researchers Peter Aaby and Christine Stabell Benn, has operated in Guinea-Bissau for decades and is closely enmeshed in the country’s health system. At least one top official, the current director of public health, held a dual appointment with Bandim as recently as December.
Kennedy praised the Danish researchers at a recent anti-vaccine conference, calling them “the deities of vaccine research”. Kennedy claimed that a prior study they conducted indicated that after vaccination, “you can have mass injuries, and catastrophic injuries, and they’re hiding in plain sight.” He did not mention that another follow-up study from the same researchers found no effects at all.
This study will focus on vaccination and mortality, as well as outcomes such as skin conditions and neurodevelopmental conditions. “The main problem of this trial is that you have some very well-known bad diseases that you can protect with this vaccine,” Støvring said. “And what they then want to study is something highly speculative – in a situation where WHO and others are saying that you should give this vaccine at birth, period.”
When asked about the study in a Thursday briefing, an official with the Africa CDC, which has opposed the trial, said there were “ongoing discussions” between the US and Guinea-Bissau and more details would be shared shortly. Guinea-Bissau planned to begin vaccinating all newborns against hepatitis B in 2027, but they pushed the campaign back to 2028.
Kennedy and the Danish researchers were “taking advantage of that delay in practicing standard care to put these children at risk unnecessarily”, Offit said. “What a terrible thing to do. What a horribly unethical and cruel thing to do.”
- This article was amended on 13 October 2026. A previous version said CIDRAP first reported news that the research trial was approved by the Denmark ethics committee. Rolling Stone had actually reported the news first.
查看本期独立摘要
中文独立摘要 · AI 整理
这件事
一项将不向部分非洲新生儿提供乙肝疫苗的争议性研究试验本周获批推进。该试验是美国卫生与公众服务部长、长期疫苗反对者小罗伯特·肯尼迪疫苗议程的核心部分。上个月的一场反疫苗会议上,肯尼迪称赞主导试验的丹麦研究人员,并把美国支持的新生儿乙肝研究称为特朗普政府疫苗议程的范例——该议程包括削减疫苗接种建议、对疫苗安全性和有效性提出质疑。费城儿童医院传染病医生保罗·奥菲特表示,肯尼迪“想让我们这个国家不再使用出生剂次疫苗,这就是目标”。由于监管原因,肯尼迪无法在美国开展此类试验。
本页概括所列来源的重点,属于独立摘要;完整报道请阅读原站。整理时间:2026年10月17日 04:44(北京时间)。
信息从哪里来
依据 The Guardian 的RSS 摘要与原文节选整理,事实核对限于列明材料;不是原文全文翻译。
- The Guardian 来源报道(RSS 摘要与原文节选)